Jan 7, 2016
Datei:Raza painting.JPG – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Wikipedia’s mission to “bring ability to anybody who seeks it” is acutely accumbent with the purpose of museums. For instance, MoMA’s own mission is to advice anybody accept and adore the art of our time. However, Wikipedia is not universally accustomed as a affection resource, decidedly in added bookish contexts. According to Wikipedia itself, in an commodity blue-blooded Criticism of Wikipedia, above apropos about Wikipedia accommodate its reliability, affection of presentation, and systemic bias — in particular, gender bent and ancestral bias.
One of the bigger barriers for museums in accurate is that Wikipedia does not broadcast aboriginal analysis or accede the ability of its contributors. Anecdotally, I’ve begin that experts in their acreage who are new to Wikipedia frequently acquisition their aboriginal edits changed because they didn’t accept and chase Wikipedia’s accurate rules about “verifiable accuracy”. Instead of deferring to professionally-recognized expertise, Wikipedia ethics transparency, verifiability, and abounding eyes: “Every accomplished adaptation of a folio is saved, so any mistakes can be calmly corrected.” And it mostly works. In their decision of Wikipedia edits, History Flow (2003), artists Fernanda Bertini Viégas and Martin Wattenberg showed that assertive types of bad edits to Wikipedia accessories are adapted in aloof minutes.
Artist James Bridle produced a twelve-volume set of all changes to the Wikipedia commodity on the Iraq War: The Iraq War: A History of Wikipedia Changelogs (2010). Bridle produced this concrete commodity to analyze the historiography facilitated by Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia association has actively courted galleries, libraries, museums and athenaeum (GLAM). MoMA itself took allotment in the 2009 wiki scavenger coursing and photography challenge Wikipedia Loves Art. Richer collaborations followed in 2010, with the Brooklyn Museum application Wikipedia pages as continued labels aural the Seductive Subversion exhibition (WikiPop) and the British Museum hosting the aboriginal “Wikipedian in residence”. The redesigned accumulating websites of the Walker Art Center and Cooper Hewitt Architecture Museum, launched in 2011 and 2013 respectively, accommodate excerpted Wikipedia content.
Wikipedia’s multilingual, collaboratively-edited album is one of the top-10 best visited websites in the world. The English adaptation abandoned contains about 5 actor accessories and allowances from the edits of added than 100,000 contributors anniversary month. By contrast, MoMA is a top 25,000 armpit globally (top 10,000 in the US). If MoMA wants bodies to accept and adore the art of our time — as our mission says we do — then we should accord to Wikipedia, which is, for best people, the agreeable website of aboriginal resort.
Encaustic painting – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Many of the bodies acquirements about art on Wikipedia use it as a starting point, not the alpha and end of their enquiry. We apperceive this because Wikipedia is already a above referrer of cartage to moma.org, alongside Google and Facebook. When MoMA appear its accumulating abstracts into the attainable domain, Wikipedians fabricated Wikidata backdrop P2174 and P2014, creating links from Wikipedia to added than 3,500 artists and 2,ooo artworks.
MoMA has boarded on a abiding and analytical assurance with Wikipedia: proactively administration MoMA advice on Wikipedia; excerpting Wikipedia on our accumulating website, with an allurement to “view or edit”; and hosting approved edit-a-thons targeting underrepresented artists.
MoMA’s web analytics appearance that artists are the access point to our collection. Of the top 500 chase agreement on moma.org in 2014, 62% are artisan names. (Just 8% are art agreement and 6% are specific artworks.) Bodies appear to art through artists. And yet best of MoMA’s agreeable development has been centered about the object, not the artist. Afore the contempo redesign of our accumulating website, best of our 10,000 artisan pages artlessly included the artist’s name, abrupt bio (“Australian, built-in 1973”), and a account of the artist’s assignment in the collection.
In 2013, MoMA’s estimation and analysis aggregation conducted an analysis of Wikipedia entries for a sample of artists in MoMA’s collection. This analysis begin that Wikipedia offered a acceptable representation of MoMA’s accumulating artists. Wikipedia covered the abounding ambit of mediums of absorption to MoMA, including architecture and film, with added entries on abreast and arising artists than art actual assets such as Grove Art Online. The alone entries were additionally added up-to-date. For example, the Wikipedia access on Marina Abramović included all-encompassing advice on the 2010 MoMA exhibition The Artisan is Present, which the Grove entry, accounting afore the retrospective, lacked. Finally, the accent and agreeable of Wikipedia accessories were anticipation to be attainable and accordant to a accepted audience, with citations arch to added resources.
Knowing that our artisan pages were an important access point to the accumulating website, and accepting accustomed that Wikipedia provided “good enough” entries for bags of those artists, we absitively to dynamically extract the advance branch of accordant Wikipedia articles. In this way, the advice on MoMA’s artists pages will be continuously updated. The anterior sections in accurate are monitored for accurateness and account by committed Wikipedia agents and volunteers.
Modern Indian painting – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
However, Wikipedia does accommodate errors and omissions and has its own biases. Wikipedia is a “good enough” antecedent but it’s not the abandoned antecedent we’re attractive to. We extract advice from both Wikipedia and Getty’s Union Account of Artisan Names and will anon acquaint added links to anxiously called alien resources, for example, SFMOMA’s Robert Rauschenberg catalog, and the artisan conversations in the BOMB annual archive. Every articulation to Wikipedia from moma.org is additionally a alarm to action: “View or adapt the abounding Wikipedia entry.”
Wikipedia represents the best intentions of the web but it sometimes avalanche short. We can all accord to authoritative it better. MoMA hosts approved edit-a-thons targeting underrepresented artists. The edit-a-thons started organically but accept become an important foundation of our abiding and analytical assurance with Wikipedia.
In October 2011, MoMA hosted its aboriginal edit-a-thon in abutment of Paola Antonelli’s architecture exhibition Talk to Me. After a bout of the exhibition, the 30 edit-a-thon participants — including accomplished Wikipedians and acceptance from NYU and Staten Island CUNY — broke into groups and formed on alteration and autograph new Wikipedia accessories accompanying to artists and altar from Talk to Me. Improvements included links aback to MoMA’s online resources.
More recently, in March 2015, MoMA and POWarts collaborated with Art Feminism on an edit-a-thon acclamation the representation of women artists, feminism, gender studies and LGBTQ issues. As of 2013, abandoned 13% of Wikipedia contributors were women and there is advancing altercation about the analysis of women contributors in the “Wikipedia boys club”.
The Art Feminism Edit-a-thon at MoMA drew over 200 participants and there were 1,500 contributors beyond 75 accessory locations, alteration in abounding languages. In MoMA’s appraisal of its own event:
Stephen B. Whatley – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Since then, MoMA has formed with Wikimedia on hosting about account edit-a-thons that abode the circle amid art and what Wikimedia agreement “missing pieces” — constituents that are underrepresented on Wikipedia. Edit-a-thons this year accept included Wiki Loves Pride, The Black Lunch Table (BLT), WikiAPA Asia Pacific Americans, Arte y Cultura Latinoamericana Latin American Art, and Basquiat Still Fly @55.
Now that we use Wikipedia as a ability aural our own website, we accept a direct — as able-bodied as indirect — stake in adorning and convalescent Wikipedia’s advantage of art and artists, in adjustment to “bring [art] ability to anybody who seeks it.”
See also: Museums Open Up to Power of Wiki, by Robin Cembalest in The Wall Street Journal.
Reserve your abode at the abutting Art Feminism Edit-a-thon on Saturday March 5, 2016. We will accommodate tutorials for abecedarian Wikipedians, advertence materials, childcare, and refreshments.
21 Ugly Truth About Modern Painters Wiki | modern painters wiki – modern painters wiki
| Delightful to the blog site, within this time We’ll teach you regarding keyword. Now, this can be the first picture:
Pin by Usa Artist on USA artist in 20 | Artist, Art, Painting – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Why don’t you consider photograph previously mentioned? is in which incredible???. if you’re more dedicated therefore, I’l t show you many graphic yet again underneath:
So, if you desire to obtain all these awesome pics related to (21 Ugly Truth About Modern Painters Wiki | modern painters wiki), click on save link to store the pics in your pc. They are all set for obtain, if you’d prefer and wish to grab it, simply click save badge in the article, and it will be instantly down loaded to your computer.} Lastly if you like to receive new and the recent graphic related to (21 Ugly Truth About Modern Painters Wiki | modern painters wiki), please follow us on google plus or bookmark this website, we attempt our best to present you regular up-date with all new and fresh shots. We do hope you enjoy staying right here. For most upgrades and recent news about (21 Ugly Truth About Modern Painters Wiki | modern painters wiki) photos, please kindly follow us on twitter, path, Instagram and google plus, or you mark this page on bookmark area, We try to present you update regularly with all new and fresh pictures, love your exploring, and find the best for you.
Thanks for visiting our site, articleabove (21 Ugly Truth About Modern Painters Wiki | modern painters wiki) published . Today we’re delighted to declare we have discovered a veryinteresting nicheto be discussed, namely (21 Ugly Truth About Modern Painters Wiki | modern painters wiki) Some people searching for information about(21 Ugly Truth About Modern Painters Wiki | modern painters wiki) and of course one of these is you, is not it?
Modern Art Oxford – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Leiter, Saul (1923- ) – 1950c. Pink Umbrella – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
File:Ostade, Isaac van – Traveller at a Cottage Door … – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Painting – Official Minecraft Wiki – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Paul Gauguin – Famous Painters Bios- Wiki Videos by Kinedio – YouTube – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Police Gazette (painting) – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Santiago Museum of Contemporary Art – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Le rideau jaune – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Modern Indian painting – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
File:Baku Museum of Modern Art.jpg – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Francis Wheatley (painter) – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Art Nouveau – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
File:Modern Painting of Dasavatar – Matsya Avatara.jpg … – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Kalighat Paintings: Well Recognized Form of Indian Modern Art … – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
German art – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki
Abstract impressionism – Wikipedia – modern painters wiki | modern painters wiki